I was thinking about aesthetics and that I had never thought about the fact that it is not just talking about something visual but is referring to not just the visual pleasure(beauty) of something but also its smell, texture, and even our hearing. From here I was led to the realization that animals with no reflective capabilities would only have an aesthetic taste (like one would have good taste in art) while the human animal has an inner taste, an expressive taste, and what would seem to be an infinite possibility of tastes even though we work from the same aesthetic base as other animals. This may be why some people are so dull, lack depth, and why looking hard within ones self and exploring all sides of sensation(life) both pain and pleasure and both inner sensations(infinite) and outer sensations(also infinite) would make one interesting and the only way to develop a style to ones character.

This may seem like a jump but bear with me. Looking at what I have written it would seem to me that atheism is in fact the truest form of believing in god, god being the infinitely changing everything as well as nothing. That being atheist is in fact believing in god a god that is all pleasure and all pain all chaos and all rationality. So yes it is a creative god god is creative in us not in itself; that our expression is in fact god is our spirit is our soul and that the deeper one looks in themselves and the more expansive ones knowledge of the world the more your spirit would express god. I don’t even like the word god I feel it is to small a concept for what it is and would be just fine giving respect to it by never giving it a name.

It was from here that I was able to concretely support the idea in my head that anarchism is the government style I would push for in my country because it is the form of government that best lends itself to the individual becoming strong in themselves and would learn to love their enemy for the simple fact that they push you to become great by being your loving opposite. I believe that centralized power is harmful not just to our exterior but much more so to our interior and that what we need is not centralized power but structures for centralized coordination; That the individual would be able to stand so strongly on their own that the whole could be chaos and almost humorous in its infinitely changing faces while the individual would be one of extreme reflection and passion and that it would only be in collective action that rational would spring forth from the whole.

I leave my thoughts here for more reflection is needed.